Article Article
Development of Scanning Acoustic Microscopy System for Evaluating the Resistance Spot Welding Quality

Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) system (TSAM-400) was designed and developed for evaluating the quality of resistance spot welding (RSW) joints of 1.5 mm-thick SUS 316 stainless steel sheets under different welding parameters. Indentation and nugget information (diameter and shape) were used for evaluating the RSW quality. SAM A-scan signals were used to calculate the indentation. The nugget diameter was determined in the C-scan image. Internal information (nugget shape, splashes, and defects) was visualized in the B- and C-scan images. In addition, the spot weld area was treated to examine the surface topography effect. The nugget diameters of treated and untreated areas were measured and compared to conclude that the surface topography effect can be neglected in the quality evaluation by SAM system. By implementing TSAM-400, some specimens were successfully tested with a scanning area of 55 Å~ 15 mm2, and a scanning time of 33.5 s corresponding to a B-scan frame rate of 4.5 Hz, and a resolution of 0.1 Å~ 0.1 mm2. Finally, the good input parameters for welding two 1.5 mmthick SUS 316 were determined by analyzing the results from TSAM-400.



1. M. Pouranvari, Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng. 2 (6), 178-–189. (2011).

2. Z. H. Hongqiang et al., Mater. Des. 63, 151–158 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.060.

3. J. Schlichting et al., NDT&E Int. 48, 23–29 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.02.003.

4. S. Kolkoori et al., Ultrasonics. 54 (2), 551–562 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.08.007.

5. O. Martín, M. López, and F. Martín, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 183 (2–3), 226–233 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.011.

6. R. J. Ditchburn, S. K. Burke, and C. M. Scala, NDT&E Int. 29 (2), 111–117 (1996). DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(96)00010-2.

7. Z. Chen et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (5), 2329–2337 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.030.

8. J. Krautkramer and H. Krautkramer, Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, 4th ed., (Springer Verlag, 1990).

9. G. Mozurkewich, B. Ghaffari, and T. J. Potter, Ultrasonic. 48 (5), 343–350 (2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.01.004.

10. T. M. Mansour, Mater. Eval. 46, 650–658 (1988).

11. D. J. Spinella, J. R. Brockenbrough, and J. M. Fridy, Weld. J. 84, 34–40 (2005).

12. Z. H. Chen et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 2329–2337 (2009).

13. G. Mozurkewich, B. Ghaffari, and T. J. Potter, Ultrasonic. 48, 343–350 (2008).

14. M. Thornton, L. Han, and M. Shergold, NDT & E Int. 54, 0963–8695 (2012).

15. A. M. Chertov, R. G. Maev, and F. M. Severin, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr. Freq.

Control. Aug. 54 (8), 1521–1529 (2007). DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2007.422. PMID: 17703655.

16. A. M. Safi et al., Procedia Eng. 90, 110–115 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.822.

17. Korzeniowski et al., Arch. Metall. Mater. 61 (2), 1009–1019 (2016). DOI: 10.1515/amm-2016-0172.

18. X. Sun et al., Nondestr.Test. Eval. 32 (3), 242–254 (2017). DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2016.1241251.

19. Zhang et al. International Symposium on Structural HealthMonitoring and Nondestructive. Saarbruecken, Germany, October (2018).

20. American Welding Society (AWS), D8 Committee on Automotive Welding. SAE D8.9M: Ecommended Practice for Test Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steel Materaials. (American Welding Society, Miami, FL, USA, 2002).

Usage Shares
Total Views
22 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage