Article Article
A Quantitative Assessment of Historical Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Probability of Detection (POD) Data for Railroad Tank Cars

This paper discusses a comprehensive analysis and quantitative assessment of two decades of nondestructive evaluation probability of detection (NDE POD) data collected using the Code of Federal Regulations’ (CFR)-approved NDE methods for railroad tank cars. The results obtained from this research demonstrate that these methods were not capable of achieving or approaching a 90-percent POD with 95-percent confidence (90/95 POD) for fatigue cracks in the butt weld (BW) test panels from the operators who participated in this research. The evaluation of the fillet weld (FW) data showed mixed results, but only the magnetic particle testing (MT) method reached 90/95 POD. Also, excessive false calls were observed in both the BW and the FW inspection results. These results indicate the variability in 1) NDE tests and calibration procedures, 2) operator variance, and 3) the influence of human factors on the application of the NDE inspection processes.

DOI: 10.32548/RS.2022.018

References

[1] Code of Federal Regulations. (2003). Title 49 CFR Section 180.509, “Requirements for inspection and test of specification tank cars.” Washington, DC. https://www.govregs.com/regulations/title49_chapterI-

i1_part180_subpartF_section180.509.

[2] Code of Federal Regulations. (2003). Title 49 CFR Section 179.7, Quality assurance program. Washington,

DC. https://www.govregs.com/regulations/title49_chapterI-i1_part179_subpartA_section179.7.

[3] Garcia, G., 2002, Railroad Tank Car Nondestructive Methods Evaluation, Technical Report No.

DOT/FRA/ORD-01/04, Washington, DC: USDOT, FRA.

[4] Garcia, G., Welander, L., Rummel, W. D., and Gonzalez, F., 2016, Probability of Detection Evaluation Results for Railroad Tank Cars, Technical Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-16/13, Washington, DC: USDOT, FRA.

[5] Poudel, A., Nunez, S.G, and Lindeman, B., 2021, Analysis of Historical Non-Destructive Evaluation Probability of Detection Data for Railroad Tank Cars, Technical Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-21/14, Washington, DC: USDOT, FRA.

[6] Berens, A.P. and Hovey, P.W., 1981, Evaluation of NDE Reliability Characterization, AFWAL-TR-81-4160, Vol. 1, Air Force Wright-Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

[7] Lewis, W.H., et al., 1978, Reliability of Nondestructive Inspections - Final Report (Have Cracks, Will Travel), USAF SA-ALC/MEE 76-6-38-1.

[8] Generazio, E.R., 2009, Design of Experiments for Validating Probability of Detection Capability of NDT Systems and for Qualification of Inspectors, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 67 (6), pp. 730 -738.

[9] Generazio, E.R., 2015, Directed Design of Experiments for Validating Probability of Detection Capability of NDE Systems (DOEPOD), NASA/TM-2015-218696.

[10] Generazio, E.R., 2011, Binomial Test Method for Determining Probability of Detection Capability for Fracture Critical Applications, NASA/TP-2011-217176.

[11] Generazio, E.R., 2011, Interrelationships Between Receiver/Relative Operating Characteristics Display, Binomial, Logit, and Bayes’ Rule Probability of Detection Methodologies, NASA/TM-2014-218183.

Metrics
Usage Shares
Total Views
42 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
42
0 PDF Downloads
0
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage
42