Publication: Publication Date: 1 September 2021
Evaluation of Stress and Stress Concentration Degree Based on the Online Piezomagnetic Measurement
The goal of this research is to correlate the piezomagnetic field with the stress and the stress concentration degree of ferromagnetic steels. Specimens of X80 steels were machined into smooth plates with circular holes in the center and tensile tests were carried out to detect the online piezomagnetic field on the surface of defective specimens. The relationship between the distribution of the stress and the distribution of the piezomagnetic field components was systematically investigated. Compared with the normal component and its gradient, the tangential component showed a better correlation with the distribution of the stress. A piezomagnetic parameter was defined to characterize the abnormal changes of the tangential component around the defect. Quantitative algorithms were established to evaluate the stress concentration degree on the basis of piezomagnetic parameters. This research will be a supplement of stress evaluation methods based on magnetic measurement technologies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2021.1963022
References
1. H. Huang et al., Nondestruct. Test. Eva. 29 (4), 377–390 (2014). DOI:10.1080/10589759.2014.949710.
2. Z. D. Wang, Y. Gu, and Y. S. Wang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 (4), 382–388 (2012). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.048.
3. K. Yao et al., Exp. Mech. 52 (3), 305–314 (2012). DOI:10.1007/s11340-011-9490-3.
4. J. W. Wilson, G. Y. Tian, and S. Barrans, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 135 (2), 381–387 (2007). DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.010.
5. Y. En and C. Xing, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 312 (1), 72–77 (2007). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.019.
6. L. H. Dong et al., NDT & E Int. 42 (4), 323–327 (2009). DOI:10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.005.
7. P. J. Guo et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323 (20), 2474–2477 (2011). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.05.015.
8. M. Roskosz and M. Ł. Bieniek, NDT & E Int. 45 (1), 55–62 (2012). DOI:10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.007.
9. J. C. Leng et al., NDT & E Int. 42 (5), 410–414 (2009). DOI:10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.008.
10. X. L. Jian, X. C. Jian, and G. Y. Deng, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 (21), 3600–3606 (2009). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.06.077.
11. L. H. Dong et al., NDT & E Int. 41 (3), 184–189 (2008). DOI:10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.003.
12. S. Bao et al., ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2015.
13. C. L. Shi et al., NDT & E Int. 43, 8–12 (2010). DOI:10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.002.
14. L. H. Dong et al., Nondestruct. Test. Eva. 25 (2), 145–151 (2010). DOI:10.1080/10589750902795366.
15. S. Bao, A. Mustapha, and H. J. Lou, ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2016.
16. S. Bao et al., Nondestruct. Test. Eva. 32 (3), 255–268 (2017). DOI:10.1080/10589759.2016.1184267.
17. S. Bao et al., Insight: Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 61 (7), 389–394 (2019). DOI:10.1784/insi.2019.61.7.389.
Metrics
| Usage | Shares |
|---|---|
Total Views 10 Page Views |
Total Shares 0 Tweets |
10 0 PDF Downloads |
0 0 Facebook Shares |
| Total Usage | |
| 10 |