
Eddy current testing is considered a theoretically challenging technique. Out of all the different nondestructive testing (NDT) methods, the electromagnetic testing (ET) method (of which eddy current testing is a technique) is probably the most difficult for understanding theory. This is perhaps why the last Materials Evaluation Back to Basics paper on eddy current testing is from 2006, which is a long time ago given the amount of innovation in the technique that has taken place since then (Hansen and Peoples 2006). In this paper we will show what has changed due to recent innovations. We first will present the physics, and then explain how modern equipment assists the user in distinguishing between different physical phenomena. Although this paper is on conventional eddy current testing, we will also mention some other ET techniques along with their advantages and disadvantages.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32548/2021.me-04218
Hansen, J., and R.B. Peoples, 2006, “Using Eddy Current Testing to Solve Industrial Problems,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 543–546
Mackintosh, D., and B. Beresford, 2005, “Probes for Remote Field Testing of Heat Exchangers: Configurations and Capabilities,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 292–296
Wassink, C., and P. Crouzen, 2018, “Pulsed Eddy Current Testing,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 700–705
Lugg, M., and M. Smith, 2018, “Alternating Current Field Measurement Testing,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 38–47
Wassink, C., M. Grenier, O. Roy, and N. Pearson, 2020, “Deployment of Digital NDT Solutions in the Oil and Gas Industry,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 78, No. 7, pp. 861–868, https://doi.org/10.32548/2020.me-04138
Usage | Shares |
---|---|
Total Views 551 Page Views |
Total Shares 0 Tweets |
551 0 PDF Downloads |
0 0 Facebook Shares |
Total Usage | |
551 |