Carbon steel is known for high strength and rigidity, while stainless steel has anticorrosion and antiwear properties. Given these characteristics, composite steel pipe, which is made from both kinds of steel, is widely used in pressure vessels and the petroleum chemical industry. Selecting carbon steel as the outer layer and stainless steel as the inner layer, this approach can not only ensure that the composite steel pipe has better mechanical properties, but can also reduce the cost of production. The thickness of the different steel layers serves as an important parameter for the evaluation of the safety performance of composite steel pipe. Because some measurement techniques can cause damage to the workpiece, nondestructive testing is preferred.
An, M., J. Sun, and Y.Y. Zhang, 2013, “Research of Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement Method Based on the Pulse Reflection Type,” Applied Mechanics & Materials, Vols. 380–384, pp. 798–801.
Maev, R.G., H. Shao, and E.Yu. Maeva, 1998, “Thickness Measurement of a Curved Multilayered Polymer System by Using an Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Method,” Materials Characterization, Vol. 41, Nos. 2–3, pp. 97–105.
Park, I.K., and T.S. Park, 2014, “Thickness Measurement of Aluminum Thin Film Using Dispersion Characteristic of Surface Acoustic Wave,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sensing Technology, Liverpool, UK, September 2014, pp. 194–197.
Schneider, D., and M.D. Tucker, 1996, “Non-destructive Characterization and Evaluation of Thin Films by Laser-Induced Ultrasonic Surface Waves,” Thin Solid Films, Vols. 290–291, pp. 305–311.
Shamgholi, M., S.M. Riazi, M. Abbasi, and S. Azimi, 2015, “The Development of Eddy Current Nondestructive Testing Method for Coating Thickness Measurement on the Steel Sheets,” 4th International Engineering Materials and Metallurgy Conference, Tehran, Iran, 10–11 November 2015.
Zhang, R., M. Wan, and W. Cao, 2001, “Parameter Measurement of Thin Elastic Layers Using Low-Frequency Multimode Ultrasonic Lamb Waves,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1397–1403.
119 Page Views
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares