Eddy Current Testing (ECT) plays a key role in detecting cracks and defects in conductors. The present study examines for the first time how the subregion method as an effective mathematical and computational technique can be admixed with Finite Element Method (FEM) to study multiple defects parameters for ECT issues. Separating a defect region from the entire domain in any computational technique will save both time and storage space. Examples of different types of defects are presented in this article . A tangible result of processing time reduction by 90% has been achieved which has led us to consider the subregion FEM method as an effective method in solving different Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) problems. An agreement between our results and others using classical FEM has been achieved which could lead to using this technique in online and field testing problems. The presented subregion FEM algorithm was verified experimentally with good agreement by testing Aluminum (T6061-T6) samples with defects. A Tunneling Magnetoresistive (TMR) sensor was used to measure the component of the magnetic field from normal to the sample top surface. A major component of minimizing processing time was achieved, which could lead to using this technique in online and field testing problems.
. S. R. H. Hoole, Computer-Aided Analysis and Design of Electromagnetic Devices (New York Elsevier Science Ltd, USA, 1988).
. A. Demenko, Selected Issues of Electrical Engineering and Electronics (WZEE) (IEEE, Rzeszow, Poland, 2016), pp. 1–6.
. A. Demenko and J. K. Sykulski, IEEE Trans. Magn. 52, 1–6 (2016). DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2521345.
. S. Matsutomo, S. Noguchi, and H. Yamashita, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 527–530 (2012). DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2176471.
. B. Jiang, Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC) (IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2012), pp. 1–4.
. K. Weeber and S. R. H. Hoole, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 1561–1564 (1992). DOI: 10.1109/20.123996.
. Z.-Q. You et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 24, 326–329 (1988). DOI: 10.1109/20.43923.
. A. Medda and V. DeBrunner, Struct. Health Monit. 8, 313–329 (2009). DOI: 10.1177/1475921709102169.
. S. Tebby, A. Barari, and E. Esmailzadeh, Computer-Aided Des. Appl. 11, 544–551 (2014). DOI: 10.1080/16864360.2014.902685.
. Z. Zeng et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 51, 1–9 (2015). DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2450194.
. S.-H. Boo and M.-H. Oh, Struct. Eng. Mech. 61, 807–816 (2017). DOI: 10.12989/sem.2017.61.6.807.
. C. Hwu, S.-T. Huang, and C.-C. Li, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 79, 13–22 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.03.003.
. P. Chen, J.-Y. Liu, and G.-C. Lu, Acta Mech. Sin. 33, 189–199 (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s10409-016-0603-1.
. S. Ratnajeevan et al., Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mechanics 47, 607–627 (2015).
. S. Sivasuthan et al., IETE Tech. Rev. 32, 94–103 (2015). DOI: 10.1080/02564602.2014.983192.
. V. Karthik et al., NDIA/GVSETS Conference (National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), Michigan, USA, 2013).
. S. Sivasuthan et al., Rev. Roum. Des Sci. Tech. Ser. Électrotech. Énergét. 60, 241–251 (2015).
. V. U. Karthik et al., Defencse Technical Information Center (Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), VA, USA, 2013).
. V. U. Karthik, Reconstructing and Classifying Damage in a 2D Steel Plate Using Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods (2015).
. S. Sivasuthan, American Society For Engineering Education North Central Section Conference (American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), MI, USA, 2014).
. S. Sivasuthan. Software Tool Methodology on a GPU for Finite Element Optimization. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University. East Lansing, Michigan, 2015.
. V. Karthik. Shape optimization Using Finite Element Analysis in Eddy Current Testing and Electro-Thermal Coupled Problems. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University. East Lansing, Michigan, 2015.
. T. Mathialakan et al., SAE Int. Journal. 8, 450–457 (2015).
41 Page Views
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares