Classification of Nondestructive Inspection Techniques with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Aerospace Application

Safety of aerospace structures must be ensured by robust procedures and methods of nondestructive testing. To fulfill such requirements, different NDT techniques are needed according to diverse physical conditions and types of defects in aerospace structures. Based on level of loading on each part and the life time of the component, a regularly scheduled maintenance is critical for inspection of aerospace components. However, to optimize the inspection schedule in terms of time and cost and to be able to cover as many types of the defects and/or different parts in each round of inspection, considering the techniques in what is called testing group and defect/part families can optimize the inspection schedule. Similar concepts have been extensively used in machining variety of parts with different machines in manufacturing industries. In this paper, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been used for classifying the NDT techniques required for inspection of defects in an aerospace structures testing plan. The presented method shows how the classification technique can be used for inspection planning and testing schedule for aerospace structures.


[1] A. A. Hassen, H. Taheri, and U. K. Vaidya, “Non-destructive investigation of thermoplastic reinforced composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 97, pp. 244–254, 2016.

[2] L. Koester, H. Taheri, L. J. Bond, D. Barnard, and J. Gray, “Additive manufacturing metrology: State of the art and needs assessment,” in AIP Conf. Proc. 1706, 2016, p. 130001.

[3] A. Poudel, S. S. Shrestha, J. S. Sandhu, T. P. Chu, and C. G. Pergantis, “Comparison and Analysis of Acoustography with Other NDE Techniques for Foreign Object Inclusion Detection in Graphite Epoxy Composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 78, pp. 86–94, 2015.

[4] A. Poudel, J. Strycek, and T. P. Chu, “Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Testing of Carbon/Carbon Composite Aircraft Brake Disks,” Mater. Eval., vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 987–994, 2013.

[5] H. Taheri, K. M. Ladd, F. Delfanian, and J. Du, “Phased array ultrasonic technique parametric evaluation for composite materials,” in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), 2014, vol. 13, p. V013T16A028; 7 pages.

[6] H. Taheri, “Utilization of non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for composite material inspection (phased array ultrasonic),” South Dakota State University, MSc Thesis, 2014.

[7] J. Du, H. Taheri, and F. Delfanian, “Wireless Eddy Current System Prototype for Nondestructive Testing,” in ASNT Annual Conference, 2013, pp. 52–58.

[8] H. Taheri, F. Delfanian, and J. Du, “Wireless NDI for Aircraft Inspection,” in ASNT 22nd Research Symposium 2013, 2013, pp. 120–126.

[9] W. Hachicha, F. Masmoudi, and M. Haddar, “Formation of machine groups and part families in cellular manufacturing systems using a correlation analysis approach,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 36, no. 11–12, pp. 1157–1169, 2008.

[10] J. L. Burbidge, “Production flow analysis,” Prod. Eng., vol. 50, no. 8, p. 352, 1971.

[11] F. F. Boctor, “A linear formulation of the machine-part cell formation problem,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 343–356, 1991.

[12] W. T. J. McCormick, P. J. Schweitzer, and T. W. White, “Problem Decomposition and Data Reorganization by a Clustering Technique,” Oper. Res., vol. 20, pp. 923–1009, 1972.

[13] J. Mcauley, “Machine grouping for efficient production,” Prod. Eng., vol. 2, no. February, pp. 305–314, 1972.

[14] R. Rajagopalan and J. L. Batra, “Design of cellular production systems A graph-theoretic approach,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 567–579, 1975.

Usage Shares
Total Views
13 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage