A Novel Non-Invasive Method for Extraction of Geometrical and Texture Features of Wood

Non invasive feature detection in wood based application requires exact discrimination between geometrical edges and texture. It has been found that traditional edge detection algorithms are highly sensitive to noise and texture and produces inferior results with wood. The present work encompasses a micro level reconstruction of Palash and Rosewood by using micro X-rays CT scanner. It also encompasses a new edge detection algorithm using newly constructed Chebyshev polynomial based fractional order differentiator. Transform based method has been used for reconstruction purpose. Newly designed fractional order filter has been applied on these reconstructed images. Chebyshev polynomial based fractional order differentiator has been used for filtering operation. Quadrature Mirror Filter (QMF) concept has been used for design of high pass filter and low pass filter. Preprocessing has been performed by using this filter. Canny edge detection algorithm has been used on this preprocessed image. The algorithm has been tested on two different test cases of wood images a) Palash and b) Rosewood. The effect of relaxation coefficient has also been presented and discussed.

  1. D Benson-Cooper, R. Knowles, F. Thompsom, D.Cown, Detection of defaults in logs, Forest Research Institute of New Zeeland 8: 9–12 (1982).
  2. T. Harless, F. Wagner, P. Steele, F. Taylor, V. Yadama, C.McMillin, Methodology for locating defect within hardwood logs and determining their impact on lumber value yield, Forest Product Journal 41:25–30(1991)
  3. Huang Qingwei, How to test wood: Guangdong Science and Technology Publishing Company. 52–57 (2002)
  4. J Sandoz, Moisture content and temperature effect on ultrasound timber grading, Wood Science and Technology 27:373–380 (1993)
  5. Manish Bajpai, P Gupta, P Munshi, V Titarenko, P J Withers, A GPU Based Parallel implementation of MART algorithm, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 24(4): 211–222 (2013)
  6. Ruchi Verma, Mayuri Razdan, P. Munshi, Monitoring of health of trees by gamma-ray CT scanners and First Kanpur Theorem, Proc. 15thAnnual Conference of the Indian Nuclear Society, Mumbai, S2-13 (2004)
  7. A. Rosenfeld and M. Thurston, Edge and curve detection for visual scene analysis, IEEE Trans. Computers., C-20: 562–569 (1971)
  8. R. C. Gonzalez, Richard E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Third Edition, Pearson Education, New Delhi, (2009)
  9. J. Canny, A Computational Approach to Edge Detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., 8(6): 679- 698 (1986)
  10. K.K. Singh, M.K.Bajpai, and R. K.Pandey, A novel approach for edge detection of low contrast satellite images Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-3/ W2:211–217 (2015) doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W2-211-2015
  11. L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, Practical cone-beam algorithm, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A1(6): 612–619 (1984)
  12. F. Natterer, F. Wubbeling, Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction, SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2001)
  13. T.J.Rivlin, The Chebyshev polynomials, John Wiley & Sons press (1974)
  14. R.K.Pandey, S.Suman, K.K.Singh, O.P.Singh, An approximate method for Abel inversion using Chebyshev polynomials, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 237: 120–132, (2014)
  15. K.B.Oldham, J.Spanier, Eds., The Fractional Calculus. New York: Academic (1974)
  16. I.Podulubny, Fractional Differential Equation, Mathematics in Science & Engineering, Academic Press: California, USA. (1998)
  17. H. Sari-Sarraf, J.S. Goddard, Vision systems for on-loom fabric inspection, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 35: 1252–1259 (1999)
  18. S.K.Mitra, Digital Signal Processing: A computer based approach, McGraw-Hill India edition, (2004)
  19. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. Nuclear Engineering and Technology Programme. Available at http://www.iitk.ac.in/net/ (accessed 28 September 2016)
  20. C B. Geo, J.L.Zhou, J.R.Hu, F.N.Lang, Edge detection of colour image based on quaternion fractional differential, IET in image Processing, 5(3): 261–272 (2011)
Usage Shares
Total Views
6 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage