Article Periodicals » Materials Evaluation » Article
Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring for Damage Detection: Reliability Aspects and Potential Solutions

This work presents general factors affecting the structural health monitoring for damage detection outcomes and discusses candidate solutions of establishing reliability measures similar to nondestructive inspection-based techniques.

References
  • Aldrin, J.C., E.A. Medina, D.A. Allwine, M.Q. Ahmed, J. Fisher, J.S. Knopp, and E.A. Lindgren, “Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Impact of Human Factors on Nondestructive Evaluation and Sensor Degradation on Structural Health Monitoring,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 26, 2007, pp. 1461–1468.
  • Aldrin, J.C., E.A. Medina, E.A. Lindgren, C.F. Buynak, and J.S. Knopp, “Protocol for Reliability Assessment of Structural Health Monitoring Systems Incorporating Model-assisted Probability of Detection (MAPOD) Approach,” Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on SHM, 2011, pp. 2452–2459.
  • Boller, C., “Next Generation Structural Health Monitoring and its Integration into Aircraft Design,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2000, pp. 1333–1349.
  • Boller, C., and N. Meyendorf, “State-of-the-art in Structural Health Monitoring for Aeronautics,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Fürth/Bavaria, Germany, 3–5 December 2008.
  • Cobb, A.C., J. Fisher, and J.E. Michaels, “Model-assisted Probability of Detection for Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring,” 4th European-American workshop on Reliability of NDE, Berlin, Germany, 24–26 June 2009.
  • Derriso, M.M., S.E. Olson, M.P. DeSimio, and D.M. Pratt, “Why Are There Few Fielded SHM Systems for Aerospace Structures?” 6th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, California, 11–13 September 2007.
  • Derriso, M.M., M.S. Leonard, M.P. DeSimio, and S.E. Olson, “Efficient Airframe Management using In-situ Structural Health Monitoring,” 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Dresden, Germany, 3–6 July 2012.
  • Diamati, K., and C. Soutis, “Structural Health Monitoring Techniques for Aircraft Composite Structures,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2010, pp. 342–352.
  • DOD, MIL-HDBK-1823A, Department of Defense Handbook: Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment, Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., 2009.
  • Duke, J.C., Jr., “Structural Health Monitoring: Before and After Crack Birth,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2004, pp. 53–55.
  • Dyer, C.S., and P.R. Truscott, “Cosmic Radiation Effects on Avionics,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, Vol. 22, No. 8, 1999, pp. 477–483.
  • Eckstein, B., C.-P. Fritzen, and M. Bach, “Considerations on the Reliability of Guided Ultrasonic Wave-based SHM Systems for CFRP Aerospace Structures,” 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Dresden, Germany, 3–6 July 2012.
  • Esperon-Miguez, M., P. John, and I.K. Jennions, “A Review of Integrated Vehicle Health Management Tools for Legacy Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 56, January 2013, pp. 19–34.
  • Generazio, E.R., “Design of Experiments for Validating Probability of Detection Capability of NDT Systems and for Qualification of Inspectors,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 67, No. 6, 2009, pp. 730–738.
  • Harding, C.A., G.R. Hugo, and S.J. Bowles, “Application of Model-assisted POD using a Transfer Function Approach,” Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 28, 2009, pp. 1792–1799.
  • Hayo, T., B. Frankenstein, C. Boller, and C. Bockenheimer, “Approach to the Technical Qualification of a SHM System in Terms of Damage Detection in Aerospace Industry,” Proceedings of NDT in Canada 2011, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2–4 November 2011.
  • Horn, D., “Reliability Analysis Combining Multiple Inspection Techniques,” Proceedings of 2006 European Conference on NDT, Berlin, Germany, 25–29 September 2006.
  • Janasak, K.M., and R.R. Beshears, “Diagnosis to Prognosis – A Product Availability Technology Evolution,” 2007 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 22–25 January 2007.
  • Kessler, S.S., E.B. Flynn, C.T. Dunn, and M.D. Todd, “A Structural Health Monitoring Software Tool for Optimization, Diagnostics and Prognostics,” 3rd Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 25–29 September 2011.
  • Lee, S.J., N. Gandhi, J.E. Michaels, and T.E. Michaels, “Comparison of the Effects of Applied Loads and Temperature Variations on Guided Wave Propagation,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 30, 2011, pp. 175–182.
  • Li, M., W.Q. Meeker, and P. Hovey, “Joint Estimation on NDE Inspection Capability and Flaw-size Distribution for Inservice Aircraft Inspections,” Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2012, pp. 104–123.
  • Lindgren, E.A., and D. Stargel, “USAF Perspective on Foundational Challenges for Enhanced Damage Sensing,” 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Dresden, Germany, 3–6 July 2012.
  • Lopez, I., and N. Sarigul-Klijn, “A Review of Uncertainty in Flight Vehicle Structural Damage Monitoring, Diagnosis and Control: Challenges and Opportunities,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 7, 2010, pp. 247–273.
  • Madaras, E.I., W.H. Prosser, G. Studor, M.R. Gorman, and S.M. Ziola, “Structural Health Monitoring of the Space Shuttle’s Wing Leading Edge,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 25, 2006, pp. 1756–1763.
  • Mandache, C., M. Khan, A. Fahr, and M. Yanishevsky, “Numerical Modelling as a Cost-reduction Tool for Probability of Detection of Bolt Hole Eddy Current Testing,” Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2011, pp. 57–66.
  • Meyendorf, N., B. Frankenstein, D. Hentschel, and L. Schubert, “Acoustic Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring,” 4th Panamerican Conference on NDE, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October 2007.
  • Pado, L.E., J.B. Ihn, and J.P. Dunne, “Understanding Probability of Detection (POD) in Structure Health Monitoring Systems,” Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on SHM, 2013, pp. 2107–2114.
  • Rummel, W.D., “Transfer of POD Performance Capabilities from Simple Shapes to Complex Shapes,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 18, 1999, pp. 2305–2310.
  • Rummel, W.D., “Challenges to Nondestructive Testing Reliability,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 73, No. 1, 2015, pp. 39–42.
  • Soejima, H., K. Takahashi, Y. Okabe, N. Takeda, and M. Yoshida, “Investigation of the Probability of Detection of our SHM System,” 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Dresden, Germany, 3–6 July 2012.
  • Sohn, H., “Effects of Environmental and Operational Variability on Structural Health Monitoring,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 365, No. 1851, 2007, pp. 539–560.
  • Stolz, C., and M. Neumair, “Structural Health Monitoring, In-service Experience, Benefit and Way Ahead,” Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2010, pp. 209–2017.
  • Stolz, C., A. Haberl, and C. Meisner, “Influences on Reliability and Performance of AU Based SHM Systems, Requirements and Approach for Detection Performance Assessment,” 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE, Berlin, Germany, 7–10 October 2013.
  • Wall, M., S. Burch, and J. Lilley, “Human Factors in POD Modelling and Use of Trial Data,” Insight, Vol. 51, No. 10, 2009, pp. 553–561.
Metrics
Usage Shares
Total Views
128 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
128
0 PDF Downloads
0
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage
128