Publication: Publication Date: 1 November 2013Testing Method:
Nondestructive Position Detection of a Metallic Target within Soil Substrate Using Electromagnetic Tomography
To determine the position of a metallic target in a cylindrical background made of soil, the electromagnetic tomography, as a nondestructive method, is employed. It is a difficult goal to produce precise electromagnetic tomography images using analytical methods. To cope with this issue, an artificial neural network is trained to mimic the electromagnetic tomography system. A hybrid optimization algorithm, which is a combination of intelligent global harmony search and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithms, is proposed to optimize the artificial neural network weights and biases. Simulation results show that the proposed method can estimate the position of target with an acceptable accurately.
References
1. R. A. Williams and M. S. Beck. (eds.). Process Tomography: Principles, Techniques and Applications.
Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, U.K. (1995).
2. M. Soleimani. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling 5:407–440 (2008).
3. A. J. Peyton, M. S. Beck, A. R. Borges, J. E. de Oliveira, G. M. Lyon, Z. Z. Yu, M. W. Brown, and
J. Ferrerra. 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Buxton, Greater Manchester, April
14–17, (1999).
4. A. J. Peyton, M. S. Beck, A. R. Borges, J. E. de Oliveira, G. M. Lyon, Z. Z. Yu, M. W. Brown, and
J. Ferrerra. 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Buxton, Greater Manchester,
April 14–17, 1999.
5. R. Palka, S. Gratkowski, P. Baniukiewicz, M. Komorowski, and K. Stawicki. Studies in Computational
Intelligence (SCI) 119:163–170 (2008).
TABLE 2 SSE for IGHSþLMA, IGHS, LMA, and GA
ANN method SSE test
IGHSþLMA 0.170416
IGHS 0.261249
LMA 0.238957
GA 0.776442
NONDESTRUCTIVE POSITION 189
6. I. V. Denisov, Yu. N. Kulchin, A. V. Panov, and N. A. Rybalchenko. Optical Memory and Neural
Networks 14:45–58 (2005).
7. N. Flores,A´ . Kuri-Morales, and C. Gamio. An application of neural networks for image reconstruction
in electrical capacitance tomography applied to oil industry. 11th Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern
Recognition, CIARP 2006, Cancu´n, Mexico, Nov. 14–17, 4225:371–380 (2006).
8. H. C. Kim and C. J. Boo. Intelligent optimization algorithm approach to image reconstruction in electrical
impedance tomography. The 2nd International Conference on Natural Computation, 4221:
856–859 (2006).
9. B. Cannas, S. Carcangiu, F. Cau, A. Fanni, A. Montisci, and P. Testoni. Part of the Proceedings of the
10th International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, August 29–31, 2007.
10. M. Zeinadini, S. Tavakoli, and A. Banookh. Journal of Telecommunications 3:22–25 (2010).
11. M. Gori and A. Tesi. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14:76–86 (1992).
12. X. Yao. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 8:539–567 (1993).
13. P. J. Angeline, G. M. Sauders, and J. B. Pollack. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5:54–65 (1994).
14. S. Shaw and W. Kinsner. Proc. of Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering 1:265–269
(1996).
15. S. K. Chang, O. A. Mohammed, and S. Y. Hahn. IEEE Trans. Magn. 30:3644–3647 (1994).
16. C. Zhang, H. Shao, and Y. Li. Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on System, Man, and Cybernetics 4:2487–2490
(2000).
17. Y. H. Shi and R. C. Eberhart. Proc. of 1998 Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming,
San Diego, 1998.
18. J. Salerno. Proc. of Ninth IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence 45–49 (1997).
19. E. Valian. M.Sc. dissertation, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Sistan
and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran, 2011. Available at www.usb.ac.ir
20. Z. W. Geem, J. H. Kim, and G. V. Loganathan. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony
search. Simulation 76:60–68 (2001).
21. D. X. Zou, L. Q. Gao, J. H. Wu, S. Li, and Y. Li. Novel global harmony search algorithm for
unconstrained problems. Neurocomputing 73:3308–3318 (2010).
22. R. C. Eberhart and J. Kennedy. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine
and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, 1995, pp. 39–43.
23. J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks,
1995, pp. 1942–1948.
24. FEKO 5.4. Copyright 2005–2008, EM Software & Systems-S.A. (Pty) Ltd.
25. W. R. B. Lionheart. Physiological Measurement 25:125–142 (2004).
26. G. Lua, L. Penga, B. Zhang, and Y. Liao. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 16:163–167 (2005).
27. R. Olmi, M. Bini, and S. Priori. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 4(April 2000).
28. V. P. Rolnik and P. Seleghim Jr. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. and Eng. (online) 28:378–389 (2006).
29. B. Mhamdi, K. Grayaa, and T. Aguili. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications
65:140–147 (2011).
30. H.-C. Kim and C.-J. Boo. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4221:856–859 (2006).
31. C. Wang, J. Lang, and H.-X. Wang RBF neural network image reconstruction for electrical impedance
tomography. Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics
4:2549–2552 (2004).
32. P. Wang, L.-L. Xie and Y.-C. Sun. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics
1064–1059 (2009).
Metrics
| Usage | Shares |
|---|---|
Total Views 20 Page Views |
Total Shares 0 Tweets |
20 0 PDF Downloads |
0 0 Facebook Shares |
| Total Usage | |
| 20 |