Effect of Ambient Background Temperature on LRU Data in Structural Health Monitoring for Bridges

Building up a historical picture of the deterioration of the total population of defects on a bridge can help reduce the risk of failure and downtime, effectively optimise the use of maintenance resources and extend the lifecycle of components. Extensive long range ultrasonic (LRU) data was gathered for different temperatures on sound steel samples and for sound and defective aluminium samples across broad frequency sweeps to determine the effect of temperature on the interpretation of LRU data when included in a structural health monitoring (SHM) database. Granular parameter sets were statistically analysed to determine the influence of temperature on the wave form and the amplitude of LRU inspections. Sensitivity to temperature was modelled and validated to ameliorate or remove the impact of temperature on waveforms. This allowed the development of comparable SHM wave form data sets. However, amplitude variations were noted for ultrasonic testing (UT) data collected at different temperatures which challenges the use of amplitude-linked parameters as defect or deterioration recognition criteria. A neural network (NN) was trained to determine accurately at which temperature UT data was acquired. This classification NN was used to validate the inclusion of temperature adjusted datasets within the SHM database. The findings of how to reduce and correct the effect of fluctuating bridge temperature on the interpretation of LRU data were incorporated into a structural health monitoring system being developed for bridges by the Wi- Health Project (283283), a collaborative project, funded by the European Union under the FP7 framework. These findings will improve the effectiveness of defect and deterioration detection and will optimise the resources needed to maintain bridges; both from the perspective of the level of staffing needed and extending the lifecycle of bridge components by the prioritisation of the maintenance schedule.

References
1. Ko, J.M. and Y.Q. Ni. “Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges,” 2nd International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, Cape Town, South Africa. 2004. 2. Catbasa, F. Necati, Melih Susoyb and Dan M. Frangopolc. “Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: Long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data,” Engineering Structures, Volume: 30 Issue:9. 2008. 3. Clarke, T. “Guided Wave Health Monitoring Of Complex Structures,” A thesis submitted to Imperial College London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Imperial College London. 2009. 4. Croxford, Anthony, Yinghui Lu, Paul Wilcox, Jennifer Michaels and Bruce Drinkwater. “A Comparison of Temperature Compensation Methods for Guided Wave Structural Health Monitoring,” Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Vol. 27, American Institute of Physics. 2008. 5. Lu, Yinghui and Jennifer E. Michaels, “A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations,” Ultrasonics Volume:43 Issue:9. 2005 6. Weaver, Richard L. and Oleg I. Lobkis, “Temperature dependence of diffuse field phase,” 1st Joint Meeting Ultrasonics International Conference/World Congress on Ultrasonics, Lyngby, Denmark. 1999. 7. Min, J., S. Park and C.B. Yun. “Impedance-based structural health monitoring using neural networks for autonomous frequency range selection,” Smart Materials & Structures, Volume:19 Issue:12. 2010.
Metrics
Usage Shares
Total Views
11 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
11
0 PDF Downloads
0
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage
11