Article Periodicals » Materials Evaluation » Article
Sizing Discontinuities by Ultrasonics

Amplitude, 6 dB drop, multi-wave mode, TOFD and phased array are the primary flaw sizing methods for ultrasonic testing. Of these, the most common methods are TOFD and phased arrays. TOFD is most accurate but requires a certain type of setup and imaging display.

References
API, API RP 5UE: Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic Evaluation of Pipe Imperfections, 2nd ed., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2005. ASME, Code Case 2235-9: Use of Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography Section I; Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2; and Section XII, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York, 2009. ASME, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1, Mandatory Appendix 12, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York, 2010. ASTM, E-2192-08: Standard Guide for Planar Flaw Height Sizing by Ultrasonics, American Society for Testing of Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2009. ASTM, E2373-09: Standard Practice for Use of Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) Technique, American Society for Testing of Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2009. Birring, A. S., “Selection of Phased Array Parameters for Weld Testing,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 66, No. 9, 2008, pp. 931–933. Birring, A. S. and G. P. Singh, “Sizing of Longitudinal Seam Weld Flaws in Thin-walled Tubes by Ultrasonic Methods,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium on Nondestructive Evaluation, San Antonio, Texas, 1981, pp. 161–172. Blanshan , B. and E. Ginzel, “The Truth Behind Creeping Waves,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 66, No. 5, 2008, pp. 465–470. CEN, CEN/TS 14751:2004, Welding – Use of Time-of-Flight Diffraction Techniques (TOFD) for Examination of Welds, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, January 2005. Gruber, G. J. and J. A. G. Temple, “Modeling the Performance of the SLIC-40 and SLIC-50 Multibeam Transducers,” Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on NDT, London, England, September 1987, pp. 704–724. Krautkramer, J. and H. Krautkramer, Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, 4th ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990. Silk, M. G., “Sizing Crack-like Defects by Ultrasonic Means,” Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, Vol. III, Chapter 2, Academic Press, London, England, 1977. Silk, M.G., “Defect Sizing Using Ultrasonic Diffraction” British Journal of Non-Destructive Testing, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1979, pp. 12–15. van Esser, S., W. B. Veldhuis, R. van Hillegersberg, P. J. van Diest, G. Stapper, M. El Ouamari, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, W. P. Th. M. Mali and M. A. A. J. van den Bosch, “Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Breast Ultrasound for Pre-operative Tumor Size Assessment in Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast,” Cancer Imaging, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2007, pp. 63–68.
Metrics
Usage Shares
Total Views
165 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
165
0 PDF Downloads
0
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage
165