A system image quality model that can predict computed radiographic image performance from the engineering parameters of any subsystem component would be a valuable tool to reduce the cycle time in the development of new systems. This paper describes the model, its adaptation for NDT applications, and the verification of the target generation and image simulations for NDT purposes.
ASTM E 1742: Standard Practice for Radiographic
Examination, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
ASTM International, 2008.
ASTM E 2002: Standard Practice for Determining
Total Image Unsharpness in Radiology, West
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, ASTM International,
ASTM E 2445: Standard Practice for Qualification
and Long-Term Stability of Computed Radiology
Systems, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
ASTM International, 2005.
IEC-62220-1: Medical Electrical Equipment — Characteristics
of Digital X-ray Imaging Devices —
Part 1: Determination of the Detective Quantum
Efficiency, Geneva, Switzerland, International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2003.
Salvat, F., José M. Fernández-Varea, Eduardo
Acosta and Josep Sempau, “PENELOPE, a
Monte Carlo Code System for Monte Carlo
Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport,”
Issy-les-Molineaux, France, OECDNEA
Data Bank, 2003.
Siewerdsen, J.H., A.M. Waese, D.J. Moseley, S.
Richard and D.A. Jaffray, “Spektr: A Computational
Tool for X-ray Spectral Analysis and
Imaging System Optimization,” Medical
Physics, Vol. 31, 2004, pp. 3057–3067.
Töpfer, K., B.W. Keelan and F. Sugiro, “Advanced
System Model for the Prediction of the
Clinical Task Performance of Radiographic
Systems,” Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6515, 2007,
van Engen, R., K. Young, H. Bosmans and M.
Thijssen, “European Protocol for the Quality
Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects
of Mammography Screening,” Addendum on
Digital Mammography, Version 1.0, National Expert
and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening
451, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, University
Medical Centre Nijmegen, 1999.