Article Article
Finite Difference Time Domain Simulation of Ultrasonic Phased Array Sector Scan for Imaging Cracks in Large Pipes, Elbows, and Tee Sections

This article reports simulation studies of ultrasonic wave generation and reception using the sector scan feature of a phased array transducer to image and size crack-like defects in large pipes, elbows, and tee sections. The simulations were based on a two-dimensional implementation of the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method. Experiments were conducted to validate modeling results for pulse-echo simulations of the phased array transducer on pipe samples with notches of three different sizes. The defects were imaged using the sector scan mode of the phased array and sized using the Absolute Arrival Time Technique (AATT). A 64 element, 5MHz linear phased array transducer with the ultrasonic beam swept over an angular range of 10–75 (refracted angles), directly in contact with the specimen, was used. Simulation and experimental studies were also conducted to image and size cracks in elbow and tee section pipes.

1. J. Woodtli and R. Kieselbach. Engineering Failure Analysis. 7(6):427 (2000). 2. USNRC. Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1063, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, (1997). FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN SIMULATION 85 3. I. Komura, T. Hirasawa, S. Nagai, J. Takabayashi, and K. Naruse. Nuclear Engineering and Design 206:351 (2001). 4. R=D Tech Guideline. Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications. 1st ed., p. 79. R=D Tech Inc., Canada, (2004). 5. R=D Tech’s Technology Information. Journal of Nondestructive Testing 7(7): (2002). Available at: 6. J. Poguet, J. Marguet, F. Pichonnat, and L. Chupin. Journal of Nondestructive Testing 7(5): (2002). Available at: 7. C. Vanhille, C. Conde, and C. Campos-Pozuelo. Ultrasonics 42(1–9):315 (2004). 8. L. Satyarnarayan, D. M. Pukazhendhi, K. Balasubramaniam, C. V.Krishnamurthy, and D. S. Ramachandramurthy. ASME Trans. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 129:737 (2007). 9. A. Krishnamurthy, C. V. Krishnamurthy, and K. Balasubramaniam. Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing 20(3):153 (2006). 10. M. Spies. Materials Evaluation 58(7):897 (2000). 11. T. Hayashi and J. L. Rose. Materials Evaluation 61(1):75 (2003). 12. Calmon, S. Leberre, T. Sollier, and P. Benoist. 16th WCNDT 2004—World Conference on NDT Aug. 30–Sep. 3, 2004, Montreal, Canada. Available at: 13. B. Hawker, S. Burch, and A. Rogerson U.K. First International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurised Components (1998). Available at: http:// 14. W. Weber. Proceedings, 1st Pan American Conference for Nondestructive Testing (PACNDT), Toronto (1998). Available at: 15. 16. 17. 18. L. Satyanarayan, C. Sridhar, C. V. Krishnamurthy, and K. Balasubramaniam. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 84:12 (2007) 19. L. Satyanarayan, K. V. Mohan, C.V. Krishnamurthy, and K. Balasubramaniam. National Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Hyderabad, India (2006) 20. H. Kasaburo. Materials Evaluation 44(9):1086 (1986). 21. L. J. Bond, N. Saffari, and M. Punjani. Proceedings, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE). 6:135 (1987). 22. C. T. Schroder and W. R. Scott. IEEE Trans. on Geo Science and Remote Sensing 38(4):1505 (2000). 23. R. V. Vossen, J. O. A. Robertssonz, and C. H. Chapman. Geophysics 67(2):618 (2002). 24. D. Hastings, J. B. Schneider, and S. L. Broschat. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 100:3061 (1996). 25. L. Azar, Y. Shi, and S. C. Wooh. NDT & E International 33(3):189 (2000). 26. P. Ciorau. Journal of Nondestructive Testing. 10(9): (2005). Available at: wcndt2004/pdf/power_generation/233_ciorau.pdf 27. J. M. Davis. Journal of Nondestructive Testing 3(11): (1998). Available at: 1198/davis/davis2.htm 28. H. Wu¨stenberg and A. Erhard. Journal of Nondestructive Testing 2(5): (1997). Available at: http://
Usage Shares
Total Views
59 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage