Enhancing Repeatability in the Measurement of Potential Drop using an Adjustable Four-Point-Probe Measuring System

The article describes an effective method of measurement for enhancing the repeatability in the experimental determination of electrical potential drop for the evaluation of materials. In the present approach, an averaging scheme is adopted for measuring the potential drop using a DC four-point-probe measuring system, where the associated probe contact distances on the material surface are adjusted in successive measurements by refreshing the individual contacts of the spring-loaded probes to the measuring surface. Statistical considerations are discussed in the context of repeatability of results using this method. Finally, the application of the method is demonstrated and discussed for a practical problem of interest, namely, the evaluation of rear-wall flaws (cracks and slots) in thick-walled structures. In an attempt to verify the accuracy, measured results are compared with the corresponding finite-element predictions of the potential drop. Results of the present study and also the comparative analysis firmly establish the appropriateness as well as reliability of the present potential-drop measuring system for obtaining repeatable measurements in the evaluation of materials.

References
1. R. K. Stanley, P. O. Moore, and P. McIntire (eds.). Special Nondestructive Testing Methods, vol. 9 of Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd ed. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH (1995). 2. S. S. Udpa and P. O. Moore (eds.). Electromagnetic Testing, vol. 5 of Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 3rd ed. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH (2004). 3. N. Bowler and Y. Huang. Electrical conductivity measurement of metal plates using broadband eddycurrent and four-point methods. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16:2193 (2005). 4. N. Bowler and Y. Huang. Model-based characterization of homogeneous metal plates by four-point alternating current potential drop measurements. IEEE Trans. Magnetics 41(6):2102 (2005). 5. Y. Ju, B. F. Ju, and M. Saka. Microscopic four-point atomic force microscope probe technique for local electrical conductivity measurement. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76(8):086101 (2005). 6. T. V. Venkatasubramanian and B. A. Unvala. An AC potential drop system for monitoring crack length. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 17:765 (1984). 7. W. D. Dover, F. D. W. Charlesworth, K. A. Taylor, R. Collins, and D. H. Michael. The Use of A-C Field Measurements to Determine the Shape and Size of a Crack in a Metal. In Eddy-current Characterization of Materials and Structures, ASTM STP 722, G. Birnbaum and G. Free (eds.), p. 401 (1981). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. 8. H. H. Johnson. Calibrating the electric potential method for studying slow crack growth. Mat. Res. Stand. 5(1):442 (1965). 9. M. Saka, D. Hirota, H. Abe´, and I. Komura. NDE of a 3-D surface crack using closely coupled probes for DCPD technique. J. Press. Vess. Technol. (Trans ASME) 120(4):374 (1998). 10. M. Saka, A. Oouchi, and H. Abe´. NDE of a crack by using closely coupled probes for DCPD technique. J. Press. Vess. Technol. (Trans ASME) 118(2):198 (1996). 11. H. Liu, M. Saka, H. Abe´, I. Komura, and H. Sakamoto. Analysis of interaction of multiple cracks in a direct current field and nondestructive evaluation. J. Appl. Mech. (Trans ASME) 66(2):468 (1999). 12. O. Buck, R. B. Thompson, and D. K. Rehbein. The interaction of ultrasound with contacting asperities: Applications to crack closure and fatigue crack growth. J. Nondestr. Eval. 4(3=4):203 (1984). 13. M. Saka, E. Schneider, and P. Hoeller. A new approach to detect and size closed cracks by ultrasonics. Res. Nondestr. Eval. 1(2):65 (1989). 14. W. Elber. Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486. p. 230. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1971). 15. S. R. Ahmed and M. Saka. A sensitive ultrasonic approach to NDE of tightly closed small cracks. J. Press. Vess. Technol. (Trans ASME) 120(4):384 (1998). 16. S. R. Ahmed and M. Saka. Crack length independent evaluation of depth of small surface cracks. Mat. Eval. 60(4):535 (2002). 17. S. R. Ahmed and M. Saka. Influence of wall thickness on the ultrasonic evaluation of small closed surface cracks and quantitative NDE. J. Nondestr. Eval. 21(1):9 (2002). 18. R. Clark, W. D. Dover, and L. J. Bond. The effect of crack closure on the reliability of NDT predictions of crack size. NDT International 20(5):269 (1987). 19. M. Saka, D. Hirota, and H. Abe´. Enhancement of sensitivity of the potential drop technique for sizing a crack by using closely coupled probes. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on NDT, Vol. 3. p. 1659, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (1996). 20. MSc Marc User’s Guide. MSc Software Corporation, Santa Ana, CA (2003). 21. H. W. Coleman and W. G. Steele. Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, pp. 26–27. (1989). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Metrics
Usage Shares
Total Views
15 Page Views
Total Shares
0 Tweets
15
0 PDF Downloads
0
0 Facebook Shares
Total Usage
15