Quantifying Bridge Deck Corrosion Using Ground Penetrating Radar
Publication: Publication Date: 1 May 2016Testing Method:
Current visual bridge deck inspection techniques do not provide enough quantitative information about the deck’s deterioration state to support maintenance and rehabilitation decisions. In recent years, ground penetrating radar (GPR) has shown promise in the ability to determine deterioration quantities, with data that can be collected quickly on multiple decks without lane closures. The work presented in this article seeks to develop a method to relate GPR analysis results to the level of active corrosion in a bridge deck. By multiplying the mean and skewness of the rebar reflection amplitudes of a variety of bridge decks, and comparing these values to corrosion quantities based on half-cell potential (HCP) measurements, a master curve with a correlation coefficient of 93% was developed. This article also presents a step-by-step procedure for developing an amplitude threshold for future deck assessments using GPR alone.
- ASTM Standard C876-09. Standard Test Method for Corrosion Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1991 (2009) Retrieved from www.astm.org. Accessed April 7, 2016.
- K. Belli, R. Birken, R. Vilbig, and S. Wadia-Fascetti. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. Denver, CO (2013).
- C. Barnes and J. Trottier. Journal of Transportation Engineering 126:3 (2000).
- C. Barnes and J. Trottier. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 10:2 (2004).
- C. Barnes, J. Trottier, and D. Forgeron. NDT&E International 41:6 (2008).
- P. Cady and W. Weyers. Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates 5:2 (1983).
- S. Cardimona, B. Willeford, J. Wenzlick, and N. Anderson. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Application of Geophysical Technologies to Planning, Design, Construction, and Maintenance of Transportation Facilities. St. Louis, Missouri (2000).
- D. Daniels. Ground Penetrating Radar. Institution of Electrical Engineers, London (2004).
- N. Gucunski, F. Romero, S. Kruschwitz, R. Feldmann, A. Abu-Hawash, and M. Dunn. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2201:34–44 (2010).
- N. Gucunski, R. Feldmann, F. Romero, S. Kruschwitz, A. Abu-Hawash, and M. Dunn. Proceedings of the 2009 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium. Ames, IA (2009).
- U. Halabe, A. Sotoodehnia, K. Maser, and E. Kausel. ACI Materials Journal 90:6 (1993).
- N. Martino, K. Maser, and R. Birken. Proceedings of the NDE/NDT for Highways and Bridges: Structural Materials Technology (SMT) Conference. New York, NY (2012).
- N. Martino, R. Vilbig, R. Birken, and K. Maser. Proceedings of the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. (2013).
- N. Martino, K. Maser, R. Birken, and M. Wang. Journal of Environmental and
- Engineering Geophysics 19:3 (2014).
- K. Maser. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1304:94–102 (1991).
- K. Maser and A. Rawson. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1347:25–28 (1992).
- K. Maser and M. Bernhardt. Proceedings of the Structural Materials Technology IV: An NDT Conference. Atlantic City, N.J. (2000).
- K. Maser. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, 116–123. Nantes, France (2009).
- K. Maser, N. Martino, J. Doughty, and R. Birken. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2313 (2012).
- K. Maser, A. Carmichael, N. Martino, and R. Birken. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management. Lake Como, Italy (2012).
- R. Parrillo, R. Roberts, and A. Haggan. Proceedings of the European Conference of Non- Destructive Testing. Berlin, Germany (2006).
- Weisstein E. Math World: A Wolfram Web Resource. (2013). Retrieved from http:// mathworld.wolfram.com/.html
- R. Weyers, B. Prowell, M. Sprinkel, and M. Vorster. Concrete Bridge Protection, Repair, and Rehabilitation Relative to Reinforcement Corrosion: A Methods Application Manual. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1993).
52 Page Views
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares