The size and complexity of bridges make the analysis of such structures difficult. Load testing is a useful technique to test the performance of bridges and assess the presence of damage. Traditional techniques for measuring the response of bridges during load testing often necessitate physical contact with the bridge and thus restrict measurements to only the contact area. A 3D terrestrial light detection and ranging (LIDAR) scanner can provide highly accurate, noncontact measurements of bridge surface points. The scanner can obtain the geometric information of the entire bridge surface area within its scanning range, making it a powerful tool for bridge load test measurements. In this paper, the 3D scanner capability was demonstrated through the testing of a high-performance steel girder bridge in Iredell County, North Carolina. By comparing the changes of bridge surface scan data before and after a static load test, displacements of surface points were calculated. Also, the accuracy of the deflection measurement and a strain calculation technique using LIDAR scan data are discussed.
ASTM, G101–04: Standard Guide for Estimating the Atmospheric Corrosion
Resistance of Low-alloy Steels, American Society for Testing of Materials,
West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2010.
ASTM, A709/A709M Standard Specification for Structural Steels for Bridges,
American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
Alaylioglu, H. and A. Alaylioglu, “Dynamic Structural Assessment of a
Highway Bridge via Hybrid FE Model and In-situ Testing.” Computers &
Structures, Vol. 63, No. 3, 1997, pp. 439–453.
Ataei, S., A. A. Aghakouchak, M. S. Marefat and S. Mohammadzadeh,
“Sensor Fusion of a Railway Bridge Load Test Using Neural Network,”
Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 29, 2005, pp. 678–683.
Au, T., Elementary Structural Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey, 1963, pp. 368–377.
Bosch, T., S. Pavageau, D. D’Alessandro, N. Servagent, V. Annovazzi-Lodi
and S. Donati, “A Low-cost, Optical Feedback Laser Range-finder with
Chirp-Control,” Conference Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Instrumentation
and Measurement Technology, May 2001, pp. 1070–1074.
Chan, T. H. T., Z. X. Li and J. M. Ko, “Fatigue Analysis and Life Prediction
of Bridges with Structural Health Monitoring Data – Part II: Application,”
International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2001, pp. 55–64.
Faber, M. H., D. V. Val and M.G. Stewart, “Proof Load Testing for Bridge
Assessment and Upgrading,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 22, No. 12, 2000,
Felkel, J. P., D. C. Rizos and P.H. Ziehl, “Structural Performance and
Design Evaluation of HPS 70W Bridge Girders,” Journal of Constructional
Steel Research, Vol. 63, No. 7, 2007, pp. 909–921.
Frýba, L. and M. Pirner, “Load Tests and Modal Analysis of Bridges,” Engineering
Structures, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2001, pp. 102–109.
Fuchs, P. A., G. A. Washer, S. B. Chase and M. Moore, “Laser-based Instrumentation
for Bridge Load Testing,” Journal of Performance of Constructed
Facilities, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2004, pp. 213–219.
Gentile, C. and N. Gallino, “Ambient Vibration Testing and Structural
Evaluation of an Historic Suspension Footbridge,” Advances in Engineering
Software, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2008, pp. 356–366.
Hassan, M., O. Burdet and R. Favre, “Ultrasonic Measurements and Static
Load Tests in Bridge Evaluation” NDT & E International, Vol. 28, No. 6,
1995, pp. 331–337.
Idriss, R. L., K. R. Whit, C. B. Woodward and D. V. Jauregui, “Evaluation
and Testing of a Fracture Critical Bridge,” NDT & E International, Vol. 28,
No. 6, 1995, pp. 339–347.
Jiang, R., D. V. Jáuregui and K. White, “Close-range Photogrammetry
Applications in Bridge Measurement: Literature Review,” Measurement,
Vol. 41, 2008, pp. 823–834.
Klowak, C. S. and A. A. Mufti, “Behaviour of Bridge Deck Cantilever Overhangs
Subjected to a Static and Fatigue Concentrated Load,” Construction
and Building Materials, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1653–1664.
Klowak, C., A. Memon and A. Mufti, “Static and Fatigue Investigation of
Second Generation Steel-free Bridge Decks,” Cement and Concrete Composites,
Vol. 28, No. 10, 2006, pp. 890–897.
Mertz, D. R., “Trends in Design and Construction of Steel Highway
Bridges in the United States,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials,
Vol. 3, No. 1, 2001, pp. 5–12.
Mills, J. and D. Barber, “Geomatics Techniques for Structural Surveying,”
Journal of Surveying Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 2, 2004, pp. 56–64.
Nassif, H. H., M. Gindy and J. Davis, “Comparison of Laser Doppler
Vibrometer with Contact Sensors for Monitoring Bridge Deflection and
Vibration,” NDT & E International, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2005, pp. 213–218.
NCHRP, Manual for Bridge Rating Through Load Testing, Research Result
Digest No. 234, National Cooperative Highway Research Program –
Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1998.
Nowak, A. S., S. Kim and P. R. Stankiewicz, “Analysis and Diagnostic
Testing of a Bridge,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2000,
Orbán, Z. and M. Gutermann, “Assessment of Masonry Arch Railway
Bridges Using Non-destructive In-situ Testing Methods,” Engineering
Structures, Vol. 31, No. 10, 2009, pp. 2287–2298.
Ryu, H. K., Y. J. Kim and S. P. Chang, “Crack Control of a Continuous
Composite Two-girder Bridge with Prefabricated Slabs Under Static and
Fatigue Loads,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2007, pp. 851–864.
Senthilvasan, J., D. P. Thambiratnam and G. H. Brameld, “Dynamic
Response of a Curved Bridge Under Moving Truck Load,” Engineering
Structures, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1283–1293.
Wang, M. L., G. Heo and D. Satpathi, “Dynamic Characterization of a
Long Span Bridge: A Finite Element Based Approach,” Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 16, Nos. 7–8, 1997, pp. 503–512.
Wasserman, E. and H. Pate, “Tennessee’s Experience with High Performance
Steel: An Owner’s Perspective,” Conference Proceedings, Steel Bridge
Design and Construction for the New Millennium with Emphasis on High
Performance Steel, Lincoln, Nebraska, National Bridge Research Organization,
December 2000, pp. 138–145.