Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite materials have become a material of choice for many aerospace and other product applications because of their particular properties. For aerospace, these properties include strength-to-weight ratio, durability, and damage tolerance achievable by tailored designs. When CFRP is applied as a primary structural element in aircraft design, the responsible structural design team will require visual inspection and 100% instrumented NDT to verify the consistency and quality of the finished component. The method selected for the instrumented NDT will be based on the CFRP characteristics, manufacturing method, structural configuration, and the application. Ultrasonic testing (UT) has been the most widely applied NDT method at the time of CFRP manufacture because of its sensitivity to the most common manufacturing defects. Other NDT methods may be enlisted depending on the particular design or feature sensitivity requirements. During CFRP service, when damage is suspected, a wide variety of NDT methods and techniques may be applicable that are suitable to the particular configuration, such as UT, bond testers, thermography, shearography, and radiography.
Baker, A., S. Sutton, and D. Kelly, eds., 2004, Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures, second edition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Campbell, F.C., 2007, Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gayle, D.M., and A.J. Donar, 2012, “Characterization of Linear Arrays for Composite Inspection,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 70, No. 6, pp. 631–637.
Hsu, D.K., R.H. Bossi, and D.P. Roach, 2014, “Chapter 14: Bond Testing” in ASNT Industry Handbook: Aerospace NDT, ed. R. Bossi, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH, p. 14.6.
Hsu, D. K., D.J. Bernard, J.J. Peters, and V. Dayal, 2000, “Physical Basis of Tap Test as a Quantitative Imaging Tool for Composite Structures on Aircraft,” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation: Vol. 19, in AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 509, Montreal, Canada, 25–30 July 1999, pp. 1857–1864.
Krautkrämer, J., and H. Krautkrämer, 1983, trans. J. Krautkrämer, B.W. Zenzinger, J.E. Bobbin, Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, third edition, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidel-berg, Cologne, Germany.
Newman, J., 2012, “Chapter 13: Laser Testing: Shearog-raphy and Holography,” in Nondestructive Testing Handbook, third edition: Vol. 10: Nondestructive Testing Overview, ed. Gary L. Workman, American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc., Columbus, Ohio, pp. 473–490.
Newman, J.W., 2014, “Chapter 12: Shearography and Holo-graphic Testing,” in ASNT Industry Handbook: Aerospace NDT, ed. R. Bossi, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH, pp. 12.1–12.32.
Shepard, S.M., and X.P.V. Maldague, 2014, “Chapter 11: Thermographic Testing,” in ASNT Industry Handbook: Aero-space NDT, ed. R. Bossi, American Society for Nondestruc-tive Testing Inc., Columbus, OH, pp. 11.1–11.21.
Shull, P.J., and B.R. Tittman, 2002, “Chapter 3: Ultrasound,” in Nondestructive Evaluation, ed. P.J. Shull, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, pp. 94–99.
Workman, G.L., and D. Kishoni, eds., 2007, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, third edition: Vol. 7: Ultrasonic Testing, American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc., Columbus, OH, p. 514.
82 Page Views
0 PDF Downloads
0 Facebook Shares